Analisis Teologis-Normatif terhadap Bioetika Teknologi Reproduksi Modern
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61295/kalanea.v7i1.226Keywords:
theological-normative analysis, bioethics, human embryos, reproductive ethics, modern reproductive technologyAbstract
Modern reproductive technology advancements such as in vitro fertilization (IVF), gamete donation, surrogacy, and genetic engineering have brought significant changes to human reproduction practices, while also raising increasingly complex bioethical and theological issues.A gap in academic research is evident in the limited studies that comprehensively examine the bioethical and theological-normative dimensions when assessing the moral implications of these technologies.This study aims to analyze the bioethics of modern reproductive technologies from a theological-normative perspective and identify the ethical implications they produce.The study employs a qualitative approach with a library research design.Data is collected from various academic literature, journals, and other relevant sources, then analyzed using content analysis to examine the principles of bioethics and the theological perspectives related to modern reproductive technologies.The findings show that although these technologies offer solutions for infertile couples, there are significant ethical concerns regarding the status of embryos, clarity of lineage, and the commercialization of the human body.These findings highlight the tension between modern bioethical principles such as autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, andjustice, and theological values that emphasize the sanctity of life and human moral responsibility.The significance of this study lies in its effort to integrate scientific and theological approaches in developing a more comprehensive ethical framework.In conclusion, modern reproductive technologies need to be regulated within a balanced ethical framework to respect human dignity and align with theological values.
References
Aznar, J., & Tudela, J. (2020). Bioethics of Assisted Reproductive Technology. In N. Sharma, S. Chakrabarti, Y. Barak, & A. Ellenbogen (Eds.), Innovations in Assisted Reproductive Technology. IntechOpen. https://doi.org /10.5772/ intechopen. 90727
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2021). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Boivin, J., Bunting, L., Collins, J. A., Nygren, K. G., & Sauer, M. V. (2020). International Estimates of Infertility Prevalence and Treatment-Seeking: Potential Need and Demand for Infertility Medical Care. Human Reproduction Open, 2020(2), hoaa052. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoaa052
Boivin, J., Bunting, L., Collins, J. A., & Nygren, K. G. (2020). International Estimates of infertility Prevalence and Treatment-Seeking: Potential Need and Demand for Infertility Medical Care. Human Reproduction Open, 2020(1), hoz019. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoz019
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. (2020). Ethics in Embryo Research: A position Statement. Fertility and Sterility, 113(2), 270–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.11.025
Ethics in Embryo Research Task Force & Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. (2020). Ethics in Embryo Research: A Position Statement. Fertility and Sterility, 113(2), 270–294.
Golombok, S. (2020). We are family: What really matters for parents and children. PublicAffairs.
Jadva, V., Imrie, S., & Golombok, S. (2021). Surrogacy families 10 years on: Relationships with the surrogate, decisions over disclosure and children's understanding of their surrogacy origins. Human Reproduction, 36(2), 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa292
Koplin, J. J., & Gyngell, C. (2020). The moral status of the embryo and the ethics of reproductive technologies. Monash Bioethics Review, 38(2), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-020-00109-4
Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Machado, C. S. (2020). The fate of surplus embryos: Ethical and emotional impacts on assisted reproduction. JBRA Assisted Reproduction, 24(3), 310–315.
Ouyang, X., & Wei, J. (2025). Multi-modal Artificial Intelligence of Embryo Grading and Pregnancy Prediction in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Review. arXiv.
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. (2021). Recommendations for practices using gestational carriers: A committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility, 115(5), 1143–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.01.018
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. (2021). Use of donor gametes in infertility treatment: A committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility, 116(6), e1–e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.08.003
Shcherbyna, V. (2020). Bioethics and Technologies of Reproductive Medicine. Biotechnologia Acta, 13(1), 5–14.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
World Health Organization. (2023). Infertility prevalence estimates and definitions. https://www.who.int
Xu, H., Ji, J., Jin, H., Ying, H., & Wu, M. (2026). Ethical Risks of Large Language Models in Medical Consultation: An Assessment Based on Reproductive Ethics. arXiv.
Zegers-Hochschild, F., Adamson, G. D., Dyer, S., Racowsky, C., de Mouzon, J., Sokol, R., Rienzi, L., Sunde, A., Schmidt, L., Cooke, I. D., Simpson, J. L., & van der Poel, S. (2021). The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2021. Human Reproduction, 36(6), 1469–1500. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab067
Zegers-Hochschild, F., Adamson, G. D., de Mouzon, J., Ishihara, O., Mansour, R., Nygren, K., Sullivan, E. A. (2021). The International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization revised glossary on ART terminology. Human Reproduction, 36(6), 1460–1466. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab069
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Riris Rollyna Gultom
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
