Implikasi Bioetika Teknologi Reproduksi Modern dalam Kajian Teologi Kristen

Penulis

  • Riris Rollyna Gultom Universitas Bhakti Pertiwi Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61295/kalanea.v7i1.226

Kata Kunci:

bioetika;, etika;, iman;, teknologi reproduksi modern;, teologi kristen;

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menelaah perspektif teologi Kristen terhadap bioetika dan implikasi teknologi reproduksi modern. Perkembangan teknologi reproduksi, seperti fertilisasi in vitro, rekayasa genetika, dan penggunaan sel punca, telah menimbulkan perdebatan etis yang kompleks dalam masyarakat kontemporer. Bioetika sebagai disiplin interdisipliner berusaha menghubungkan kemajuan ilmu pengetahuan dengan nilai moral, namun dalam konteks iman Kristen, diperlukan peninjauan ulang terhadap prinsip-prinsip dasar yang berakar pada Kitab Suci dan tradisi gereja. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan analisis literatur teologis, etis, dan bioetik yang relevan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa teologi Kristen menekankan martabat manusia sebagai imago Dei, sehingga setiap intervensi teknologi reproduksi harus mempertimbangkan kesucian hidup, keutuhan keluarga, dan tanggung jawab moral. Selain itu, ditemukan adanya ketegangan antara dorongan ilmiah untuk memperluas kemungkinan reproduksi dengan prinsip etis yang menolak manipulasi berlebihan terhadap kehidupan. Implikasi praktis penelitian ini adalah perlunya dialog antara teolog, bioetikus, dan praktisi medis untuk merumuskan pedoman etis yang kontekstual bagi masyarakat Indonesia. Penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa integrasi antara iman dan ilmu pengetahuan merupakan langkah penting dalam menghadapi tantangan bioetika modern. Dengan demikian, kajian ini berkontribusi pada pengembangan wacana akademik yang kritis mengenai hubungan antara teologi Kristen, bioetika, dan teknologi reproduksi modern.

Kata kunci: bioetika, etika, iman, teknologi reproduksi modern, teologi kristen

Referensi

Aznar, J., & Tudela, J. (2020). Bioethics of Assisted Reproductive Technology. In N. Sharma, S. Chakrabarti, Y. Barak, & A. Ellenbogen (Eds.), Innovations in Assisted Reproductive Technology. IntechOpen. https://doi.org /10.5772/ intechopen. 90727

Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2021). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Boivin, J., Bunting, L., Collins, J. A., Nygren, K. G., & Sauer, M. V. (2020). International Estimates of Infertility Prevalence and Treatment-Seeking: Potential Need and Demand for Infertility Medical Care. Human Reproduction Open, 2020(2), hoaa052. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoaa052

Boivin, J., Bunting, L., Collins, J. A., & Nygren, K. G. (2020). International Estimates of infertility Prevalence and Treatment-Seeking: Potential Need and Demand for Infertility Medical Care. Human Reproduction Open, 2020(1), hoz019. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoz019

Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. (2020). Ethics in Embryo Research: A position Statement. Fertility and Sterility, 113(2), 270–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.11.025

Ethics in Embryo Research Task Force & Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. (2020). Ethics in Embryo Research: A Position Statement. Fertility and Sterility, 113(2), 270–294.

Golombok, S. (2020). We are family: What really matters for parents and children. PublicAffairs.

Jadva, V., Imrie, S., & Golombok, S. (2021). Surrogacy families 10 years on: Relationships with the surrogate, decisions over disclosure and children's understanding of their surrogacy origins. Human Reproduction, 36(2), 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa292

Koplin, J. J., & Gyngell, C. (2020). The moral status of the embryo and the ethics of reproductive technologies. Monash Bioethics Review, 38(2), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-020-00109-4

Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Machado, C. S. (2020). The fate of surplus embryos: Ethical and emotional impacts on assisted reproduction. JBRA Assisted Reproduction, 24(3), 310–315.

Ouyang, X., & Wei, J. (2025). Multi-modal Artificial Intelligence of Embryo Grading and Pregnancy Prediction in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Review. arXiv.

Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. (2021). Recommendations for practices using gestational carriers: A committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility, 115(5), 1143–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.01.018

Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. (2021). Use of donor gametes in infertility treatment: A committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility, 116(6), e1–e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.08.003

Shcherbyna, V. (2020). Bioethics and Technologies of Reproductive Medicine. Biotechnologia Acta, 13(1), 5–14.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

World Health Organization. (2023). Infertility prevalence estimates and definitions. https://www.who.int

Xu, H., Ji, J., Jin, H., Ying, H., & Wu, M. (2026). Ethical Risks of Large Language Models in Medical Consultation: An Assessment Based on Reproductive Ethics. arXiv.

Zegers-Hochschild, F., Adamson, G. D., Dyer, S., Racowsky, C., de Mouzon, J., Sokol, R., Rienzi, L., Sunde, A., Schmidt, L., Cooke, I. D., Simpson, J. L., & van der Poel, S. (2021). The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2021. Human Reproduction, 36(6), 1469–1500. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab067

Zegers-Hochschild, F., Adamson, G. D., de Mouzon, J., Ishihara, O., Mansour, R., Nygren, K., Sullivan, E. A. (2021). The International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization revised glossary on ART terminology. Human Reproduction, 36(6), 1460–1466. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab069

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2026-07-05

Cara Mengutip

Gultom, R. R. (2026). Implikasi Bioetika Teknologi Reproduksi Modern dalam Kajian Teologi Kristen. Jurnal Kala Nea, 7(1), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.61295/kalanea.v7i1.226

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles